Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Guidance versus Self-Reflection: the Oskar Schindler Factory, Krakow

Unlike Warsaw, the city of Krakow was not destroyed and later rebuilt after the Second World War. Its medieval central square, castle, cathedrals, and even its synagogues remain—preserved, as one of our tour guides said, by the Nazis in order to serve as a sort of museum of an extinct race. Today, Krakow’s preserved history reminds today’s visitors of the city’s rich, multicultural past.

Main square, Krakow, with typical Polish summer weather

Despite the presence of very real historical buildings and locations, including the nearby Auschwitz concentration camp, Krakow’s Oskar Schindler Factory Museum also falls into the category of museums attempting to evoke certain feelings in its visitors. It strayed, however, from the idolization of national heroes that I had come to expect from Polish museums. The museum is housed in what had been Schindler’s cookware factory, where he employed several hundred Polish Jews from the nearby Kazimierz Jewish district, and later the Krakow ghetto.

The Old Synagogue, the oldest synagogue still standing in Poland
For the uninitiated, Schindler and his wife bribed the Nazis—of which Oskar Schindler was a prominent member—in order to keep their Jewish workers employed, and thus saved them from almost certain death in extermination camps after the Krakow ghetto was liquidated. Because Jews could only escape deportation by doing work directly related to the German war effort, Schindler began manufacturing anti-tank grenades. Using his connections with the Nazi party, Schindler was able to have 700 of his workers who had been sent to the concentration camp at Gross-Rosen rerouted to his munitions factory, where they waited out the rest of the war. Schindler and his wife are credited with saving the lives of 1,200 Jewish men and women from extermination.
While the museum could have easily become a shrine to the Schindlers’ heroic actions, only a small section is dedicated to the couple. The rest of the museum focuses on Krakow during the Nazi occupation (1939-45). The effect is certainly dramatic. One weaves through Nazi flags that are suspended from a hallway ceiling and into a room where the floor is paved with swastikas, forcing the visitor to trample upon the symbol of the Third Reich. Visitors can walk through a mock-up of a family’s cramped ghetto living quarters. There is contemporary film footage and audio throughout the museum, showcasing everything from weekly markets to the roundup of Jews for relocation.  There is a strong note of sympathy for all of Krakow’s residents, not just those targeted for elimination by the Nazis. Like the Warsaw Uprising Museum, the Polish population is portrayed through personal testimony and interviews sprinkled into every exhibit. While personal stories do bring the past into the present, the heroic overtones throughout the museum may again be attempting to invoke an uncomfortable level of nationalism.

Swastika floor in the Oskar Schindler Factory
 The most striking exhibit is the centerpiece of the museum, Schindler’s office, where a map of Europe discovered during construction hangs behind Schindler’s desk.[1] In the center of the room, however, is a ceiling-high glass enclosure that is filled with unfinished enamelware like that produced in the factory. Visitors can walk through the center of the cube and read the names of the 1,200 Jews that were saved: Schindler’s list.
At the end of the museum, visitors walk through a short, unlit hallway over a rubbery floor that serves as one final multi-sensory reminder of the confusion Krakow’s inhabitants faced during occupation. Just before exiting the factory into the courtyard, one is thrust into a white, circular room, where turning pillars set into the wall are reminiscent of the scrolls of the Torah. The museum calls it the Room of Choices. Printed on the walls in Hebrew, German, Polish, French, English, and other languages are quotes from those who, like the Schindlers, chose to take action against the Nazis by helping the persecuted. It is a thought-provoking way to end a visit to a museum that often seemed to have only one thought it wished to convey: that life in Krakow under Nazi occupation was horrendous. But by ending on the Room of Choices, the museum asks the visitor to look inward to his or her own morality, and ask, ‘Would I have done the same?’ In this way the museum, which until that point had borne the brunt of bringing the past into the present, forces the visitor to reflect, and carry those thoughts out into the world.


The Room of Choices, Oskar Schindler Factory


Kelsey Allagood is a Master of Arts candidate in Conflict Resolution at Georgetown University. She recently traveled to Poland and Germany with Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service in Qatar with the Zones of Conflict, Zones of Peace Program. Her travel was facilitated by Georgetown University's Master of Arts program in Conflict Resolution.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Warszawa, the Uprising, and Reconciling with the Past




     Warsaw’s legacy as a city razed by the Nazis is apparent in the Soviet-style architecture that defines its main town center. The facades are gray and severe, much like the early summer rain showers that marked my single day here. For a city that experienced such devastation, however, the story that is told in Warsaw is as much a story of survivors as it is about the victims of Nazi and Soviet occupation.
      I spent most of my first day in the city at the Warsaw Uprising Museum. The fortress-like red brick structure immediately invokes in the visitor a feeling of entrapment, both physically and chronologically. One enters through the main gates and is guided by bronze arrows toward the museum proper (as well as the ticket counter and souvenir shop). The museum is dark and cavernous, with stone floors and plaster walls papered in vintage newspapers and flyers. In the center of the room is the towering monument to the Uprising: a two-story slab of black stone engraved with the symbol of the Uprising on one side. The other side is pocked with bullet holes, from within which emanates the sounds of war: gunshots, shouting, running, marching, radio broadcasts. Over everything, there is the constant sound of a heartbeat.
     The heartbeat, according to the museum, represents the sacrifice of the Polish people, the still-living heart of the resistance movement, and the unification of Poles through hardship. The heartbeat follows the visitor through the museum, but you never quite get used to it. By the end of a few hours in the museum, it is a nearly overwhelming presence. As you view the portraits of resistance fighters, the working printing press, the relics and weapons and grave markers that populate the museum, the heartbeat remains. It appears meant to instill in the visitor the fact that the Jews in the ghettos and those who fought during the Uprising were active, real people, with lives and personalities that often get lost in the sometimes dry, sterile world of historiography.
     The Uprising Museum’s main goal is plainly to write a narrative of the events of the Uprising from the point of view of those involved. It is an intense, multi-sensory experience that is meant to immerse the visitor in the experience of the Uprising. This type of immersive museum experience has become more popular in recent years as museums struggle to keep new generations engaged in history. Such experiences can be a powerful way of bringing the past to life, especially as conflicts lose their feeling of rawness and the fresh wounds begin to heal. But they can also feel overdramatized, and sometimes run the risk of idealizing those who they are commemorating. There is a thin line between artifact and holy relic, and the elevation of victims to martyrs can be disconcerting to some. It can be uncomfortably similar to the intense nationalism that leads to conflict to begin with, and does nothing to promote understanding or reconciliation.
     Some might argue, however, that remembrance, not reconciliation, is the goal of a museum. I would posit that if museums are to remain relevant and active—like the people and events they are commemorating—then there can certainly be a place for the furthering of reconciliation in the goal of a museum. Understanding the stories of the past is a step toward this goal, but resolving lasting wounds and preventing future atrocities takes more effort than simply disseminating information.


Kelsey Allagood is a Master of Arts candidate in Conflict Resolution at Georgetown University. She recently traveled to Poland and Germany with Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service in Qatar with the Zones of Conflict, Zones of Peace Program. Her travel was facilitated by Georgetown University's Master of Arts program in Conflict Resolution.